![](/Content/images/logo2.png)
Original Link: https://www.anandtech.com/show/2987
So of course the one thing everyone asked for was something I couldn't deliver for the first part of the Fall 2003 Video Card roundup - Half Life 2 performance. Of course there were requests for Doom3 performance and believe me, if we had the benchmarks we would definitely have included them. As you can guess, Valve has not released the Half Life 2 benchmark as originally expected and thus we don't have updated Half Life 2 numbers for you. The conclusion of the recent article did reference Doom3 and Half Life 2 performance however, and believe me I wasn't just pulling numbers and thoughts out of the air - I've got some basis for what I've said.
Here are some Half Life 2 numbers for you to look at; they were provided by a reliable source, but I could not verify anything myself so take them with a grain of salt. ATI was running in their DX9 codepath and the mixed mode codepath was used for NVIDIA. No AA/AF was enabled and we're looking at 1024x768 scores:
Half
Life 2 Demo
|
Radeon
9800XT
|
NVIDIA
GeForce FX 5950 Ultra
|
e3_bugbait |
71.4
|
73.9
|
e3_c17_01 |
57.6
|
57.5
|
e3_c17_02 |
49.9
|
49.3
|
e3_phystown |
74.5
|
77.2
|
e3_seafloor |
53.9
|
53.3
|
e3_techdemo_5 |
83.5
|
64.5
|
e3_techdemo_6 |
76.9
|
71.7
|
e3_under_02 |
77.3
|
71.1
|
If those numbers hold true then things definitely look better than from Half Life 2 day, but we'll reserve judgement until we get the benchmark in house. I just thought you'd like to see what we're seeing, I wouldn't draw any conclusions based on this data yet, just wanted to share :)
Tomorrow is my 8AM day again, and maybe I'll get those tests back that I took on Monday (hopefully not...I'd like tomorrow to be a good day :)...). I'm off to sleep, have a good night everyone. Derek and I will be back to work on Part II tomorrow; I'll update you as soon as I can.